Сборка Firefox для Windows работает быстрее сборки для Linux
Рубрика: Linux -> Windows -> Разработка
Среда, 17 июня 2009 г.
Просмотров: 2980
Подписаться на комментарии по RSS
Среда, 17 июня 2009 г.
Просмотров: 2980
Подписаться на комментарии по RSS
Недавно прочитал новость на о том что даже под Wine Firefox работает быстрее родного варианта. Решил проверить: всё таки у меня Firefox собран "своими руками" можно сказать, а под Windows сборка рассчитана на совместимость с i586.
В использовались тесты , и . От использования я отказался ввиду того, что раз от раза он выдаёт разные результаты, т.е. по хорошему если его использовать, то надо запускать его несколько раз и усреднять результаты, а я - человек ленивый....
Тестирование проводилось в условиях: одноядерный Athlon64 3000+, 1GB RAM, Gentoo x86_64 (kernel 2.6.28).
Ниже результаты тестов.
:
| Тест | Firefox/3.0.6 (Native) | Firefox/3.0.6 (Wine) |
| Total Score: | 22.15runs/s ±5.30% | 28.24runs/s ±4.15% |
| ▶ 3D Mesh Transformation | 15.32runs/s ±11.28% | 26.22runs/s ±40.89% |
| ▶ 3D Raytrace | 30.60runs/s ±22.65% | 31.18runs/s ±13.33% |
| ▶ AES Encryption/Decryption | 14.01runs/s ±42.71% | 13.12runs/s ±7.45% |
| ▶ Arrays | 57.80runs/s ±4.57% | 64.22runs/s ±3.76% |
| ▶ Base 64 Encoding and Decoding | 22.07runs/s ±18.07% | 21.11runs/s ±23.14% |
| ▶ Bitwise And | 55.75runs/s ±1.40% | 45.64runs/s ±1.20% |
| ▶ Code Evaluation | 81.20runs/s ±33.84% | 85.26runs/s ±30.02% |
| ▶ Compute Bits in Byte | 17.06runs/s ±1.16% | 13.66runs/s ±1.24% |
| ▶ Compute Bits in Byte (2) | 21.84runs/s ±1.27% | 15.80runs/s ±1.34% |
| ▶ DNA Sequence Alignment | 39.26runs/s ±17.93% | 41.48runs/s ±9.06% |
| ▶ DNA Sequence Counting | 18.27runs/s ±2.63% | 19.66runs/s ±2.35% |
| ▶ DOM Attributes | 28.12runs/s ±8.26% | 37.57runs/s ±10.72% |
| ▶ DOM Attributes (Prototype) | 41.12runs/s ±8.19% | 61.07runs/s ±5.24% |
| ▶ DOM Attributes (jQuery) | 36.02runs/s ±5.52% | 46.58runs/s ±17.75% |
| ▶ DOM Events (Prototype) | 28.83runs/s ±32.56% | 36.07runs/s ±14.34% |
| ▶ DOM Events (jQuery) | 21.43runs/s ±15.26% | 26.56runs/s ±6.37% |
| ▶ DOM Modification | 10.11runs/s ±11.71% | 46.05runs/s ±7.59% |
| ▶ DOM Modification (Prototype) | 11.08runs/s ±7.34% | 15.06runs/s ±2.97% |
| ▶ DOM Modification (jQuery) | 19.58runs/s ±9.36% | 37.27runs/s ±6.47% |
| ▶ DOM Query | 112.18runs/s ±1.07% | 160.51runs/s ±2.25% |
| ▶ DOM Style (Prototype) | 30.43runs/s ±8.99% | 43.00runs/s ±5.74% |
| ▶ DOM Style (jQuery) | 20.10runs/s ±20.31% | 28.92runs/s ±9.31% |
| ▶ DOM Traversal | 6.32runs/s ±1.58% | 9.30runs/s ±1.13% |
| ▶ DOM Traversal (Prototype) | 26.84runs/s ±8.38% | 36.74runs/s ±6.26% |
| ▶ DOM Traversal (jQuery) | 12.17runs/s ±2.23% | 16.79runs/s ±2.23% |
| ▶ Date Formatting | 54.91runs/s ±25.13% | 72.39runs/s ±1.56% |
| ▶ Date Formatting (2) | 33.11runs/s ±39.51% | 38.37runs/s ±34.54% |
| ▶ DeltaBlue Constraint Solving | 19.29runs/s ±1.40% | 20.52runs/s ±1.34% |
| ▶ Fannkuch | 25.99runs/s ±0.94% | 21.75runs/s ±1.13% |
| ▶ MD5 Hashing | 39.50runs/s ±30.34% | 37.60runs/s ±1.03% |
| ▶ N-Body Rotation and Gravity | 12.98runs/s ±62.57% | 19.06runs/s ±1.68% |
| ▶ Partial Sum Calculation | 23.55runs/s ±57.08% | 47.93runs/s ±56.54% |
| ▶ Prime Number Computation | 12.77runs/s ±46.26% | 12.40runs/s ±30.19% |
| ▶ Prime Number Computation (2) | 10.18runs/s ±32.18% | 15.00runs/s ±4.04% |
| ▶ RSA Encryption/Decryption | 3.53runs/s ±16.88% | 3.50runs/s ±0.98% |
| ▶ RayTracer | 0.94runs/s ±27.14% | 1.55runs/s ±14.28% |
| ▶ Recursive Number Calculation | 49.20runs/s ±1.08% | 38.64runs/s ±2.50% |
| ▶ Regular Expressions | 10.17runs/s ±1.32% | 12.12runs/s ±1.41% |
| ▶ Richards Benchmarks | 36.57runs/s ±0.62% | 34.82runs/s ±1.13% |
| ▶ Rotating 3D Cube | 32.17runs/s ±40.61% | 30.39runs/s ±17.13% |
| ▶ SHA1 Hashing | 42.99runs/s ±2.53% | 35.34runs/s ±2.07% |
| ▶ Script Unpacking | 5.13runs/s ±11.92% | 5.48runs/s ±4.49% |
| ▶ Spectral Norm of a Matrix | 5.85runs/s ±180.44% | 28.99runs/s ±2.84% |
| ▶ String Parsing and Searching | 1.41runs/s ±34.47% | 2.41runs/s ±25.62% |
| ▶ Strings | 67.45runs/s ±6.29% | 62.34runs/s ±3.89% |
| ▶ Tag Cloud Creation | 23.29runs/s ±13.53% | 31.59runs/s ±18.38% |
| ▶ Traversing Binary Trees | 22.11runs/s ±1.84% | 28.03runs/s ±15.72% |
| ▶ Trigonometric Calculation | 45.32runs/s ±1.37% | 31.77runs/s ±1.69% |
| ▶ Validate User Input | 26.56runs/s ±34.56% | 27.43runs/s ±44.77% |
| Total Score: | 22.15runs/s ±5.30% | 28.24runs/s ±4.15% |
Первый тест подтвердил результаты из оригинальной статьи.
Идём дальше...
:
| Тест | Сравнение | Firefox/3.0.6 (Wine) | Firefox/3.0.6 (Native) |
| ИТОГ | 1.14x as fast | 11327.2ms +/- 2.3% | 9914.6ms +/- 1.4% |
| 3d | 1.23x as fast | 1456.8ms +/- 16.7% | 1182.4ms +/- 3.7% |
| access | 1.25x as fast | 1954.8ms +/- 2.3% | 1569.6ms +/- 2.1% |
| bitops | 1.32x as fast | 1725.6ms +/- 2.4% | 1304.8ms +/- 2.5% |
| controlflow | 1.26x as fast | 157.2ms +/- 0.7% | 124.4ms +/- 0.9% |
| crypto | 1.21x as fast | 730.4ms +/- 2.7% | 605.6ms +/- 3.7% |
| date | 1.16x as slow | 769.6ms +/- 5.6% | 889.2ms +/- 6.4% |
| math | 1.27x as fast | 1352.8ms +/- 1.6% | 1069.0ms +/- 3.7% |
| regexp | 1.09x as slow | 722.4ms +/- 3.9% | 789.6ms +/- 9.5% |
| string | - | 2457.6ms +/- 12.1% | 2380.0ms +/- 2.8% |
А вот тут получили диаметрально противоложный результат. Так что, не всё так однозначно...